Difference between Industrial Robots and Cobots I Robotic Automation in delhi
Industrial robots are typically large, fixed equipment designed for the high-volume, extremely high-accuracy, and high-speed production. Because of the speed of the robot’s arm movement, the industrial robots can present safety risks to human workers, so they usually require safety measures such as a cage to keep humans out of the robot’s work envelope. The integration of the robot and its safety caging can drive the costs up substantially, as can the need for professional services to program these complex robots and integrate them with other production equipment and machines. These characteristics make the traditional industrial robots best suited for production processes that will continue unchanged for years, where return on investment (ROI) can also take years.
Cobots are ideal for the manufacturers with low-volume, high-mix production or who need to safely automate processes alongside human workers. That might include automating a repetitive task and handing a part off to a human for inspection or to complete a complex assembly process.
Cobots typically have the lower upfront costs and are easy to program with no previous experience, so they offer fast ROI. They are small and lightweight enough that they can be easily moved and redeployed to automate the different processes throughout a manufacturing facility. These versatile, cost-effective, and user-friendly tools allow the businesses of almost any size (and any level of technical expertise) to increase productivity, improve quality, and respond more nimbly to changing customer demands.
Here is a quick look at some of the differences between the traditional industrial robots and cobots.
TRADITIONAL ROBOTS | COBOTS |
Big batches, little variability Ideal for large companies that manufacture high volumes of the same products for long periods | Low-volume, high-mix Designed for low-volume, high-mix production, where the robot is often redeployed for new processes |
Complex deployment Requires extensive programming skills and takes days or weeks to set up | Fast and easy deployment Easy to deploy with simple programming that inexperienced users can set up in minutes |
Requires constancy Programmed for unchanging environment and the same movement with minimal need to adapt | Adapts to environment Flexible to adapt to changing environment and workpieces to be handled |
Not safe without guarding Typically requires safety guarding to keep human workers out of the robot's work cell | Collaborative and safe After risk assessment, humans can work alongside robot in collaborative applications |
Focus on the robot Repeats the same actions for years, with unchanging tool that is integrated for a specific process | Focus on the EOAT As robot arm becomes a commodity, focus shifts to EOAT to increase robot utilization |
Big investment, longer ROI Expensive robots, system integration, and operator training requires larger upfront investment and takes longer for ROI | Lower upfront cost, faster ROI Competitive pricing, in-house integration, and ease-of-use minimize upfront costs and speed integration, uptime and ROI |
Comments
Post a Comment